Update to the Introduction
to Round Two
In my Introduction to Round Two, below, I stated
that “(J)udges and all public officials take an Oath of Office”, and I stated even
further that “every once in a while, a public official, holding an office of
public trust, forgets his responsibility and needs to be reminded that he took
“this obligation freely””. One obvious
dynamic, for which I forgot to plan, was the ever-present “ignorage” factor, a
term coined by my late friend and mentor – Alan-Eugene Bacon. I don’t know why I forgot it; maybe I was
still euphoric over my prior success.
Yet, I have seen it in evidence so many times. It is the preferred factor employed by all
government actors when they are faced with an issue, the nature of which, they
want to avoid. You see it in lowly
clerks, in department heads, in congressmen, senators, secretaries, and
presidents. It can take a number of
forms. The government actor who is a
target of the uncomfortable truth may equivocate, answer a different question –
one that was not asked, change the subject, claim lack of knowledge or lack of
jurisdiction, or more than likely, pretend that s/he didn’t even hear you. That is one of the favorite ploys of the
government actors in our so-called “justice” system.
As you read through the case, indexed on the left,
you will observe that the fundamental principles of the Constitution, which all
in government are pledged by Oath to observe, are just ignored. Statutes and “court” cases are taken out of
context and cited to support a point of view to achieve a government objective,
which objective is to win. The “courts”,
a branch of government, dependant for their existence and the continued
employment of their occupants on the largess of the other two branches of government,
find it easy and smart to go along with the scam. Justice, as we understand that word to mean,
is not in their lexicon.
When they (the courts and fellow travelers) find
themselves caught at their game and they are not able to stop a pesky sovereign
from nipping at their heels, they claim that their precious time and talent is
being wasted, and so therefore, it is perfectly proper for them to abandon any
semblance of due process, and merely issue an order. No reasons are ever given: “the Court has considered
all motions and pleadings, and the Court has ORDERED that the “Government’s
Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED”.
Today, that is what passes for due process and the Rule of Law in
amerika. If you expect due process, justice, and a Rule of Law, don’t go to “court”; talk to
God. You’ll get justice; no doubt about
it.
Introduction to Round Two
In Round One, we learned that the
so-called “courts” in a civil matter were really just commercial enterprises
for dispute resolution. If one were involved
in a contract dispute, the court could adjudicate any controversy over the
terms and conditions and render a decision as to the outcome of the
contract. One may recall the
announcement: “Hear ye,
Hear ye. Anyone with business before this court, please step
forward and be recognized.” The emphasis
is on “business”.
Of course, if there were no contract, or
if there was no controversy, the court was barren of any purpose, and claims
brought before the “court” had to be dismissed.
This is where we learned the meaning of the oft used phrase – “dismissed
for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted.”
In Round Two, we will learn another
principle under which the “courts” must operate. It is the Supreme Law of the Land – The
Constitution of the
Judges and all public officials take an
Oath of Office that requires them to “administer justice without respect to
person”, do equal right to the poor and to the rich”, “faithfully and
impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent … under the
Constitution and laws of the United States”, “support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic”,
“bear true faith and allegiance to the same”, “take this obligation freely,
without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion”, “will well and
faithfully discharge the duties of the office”, “So Help Me God”.
This is a daunting role, and woe be it for the public official that takes his Oath
lightly. Violations of the Oath are
tantamount to Treason. And, the penalty
for Treason is not a cake walk. Of course,
every once in a while, a public official, holding an office of public trust,
forgets his responsibility and needs to be reminded that he took “this
obligation freely”. We will respectfully
jog his memory, and freely exercise our right to sovereignty.
Contact Hank at hdgoltz@juno.com